A Comparative Study of Coherent Ising Machine Architectures Through a Unified Simulation Model
Vidisha Singhal, Peter Bermel · IEEE Access · 2025
Coherent Ising Machines (CIMs) have emerged as promising hardware solvers for NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems, potentially offering energy-efficiency, accuracy, speed, and scalability. These problems span applications including scheduling, routing, resource allocation, and machine learning. Spin amplitude inhomogeneity (an artifact of its analog nature) can hinder CIM convergence to the ground state. Several CIM modifications have been proposed to address this issue. However, no prior work has systematically compared the performance of these concepts. This paper presents the first side-by-side evaluation of six promising CIM architectures using a unified simulation model. We develop stochastic differential equations, find optimal hyperparameters via Bayesian optimization per problem-architecture pair, and assess the performance on multiple metrics using MaxCut instances from the Gset and BiqMac datasets. CIM-SNN outperforms the rest on most metrics, with a 54.21% average success probability (SP) improvement and 1.36× less time-to-solution (TTS) at 96% GS energy compared to the Standard CIM on BiqMac graphs. Other CIMs show some advantages on certain Gset graphs. CIM-QA is usually the worst-performing, with an 18.55% average SP loss and a 1.30× higher TTS at 96% GS compared to the Standard CIM on BiqMac graphs. CIM-SNN demonstrates the greatest noise robustness and promise for further tuning via a linear pump schedule. CIM-QA benefits from high noise levels. This study makes two key contributions: (1) identifying promising CIM architectures to guide targeted research and accelerate practical adoption, and (2) providing a unified framework for evaluating future architectural modifications against existing ones.