Is more immersive always better? VR CAVE vs. desktop VR for shaping tourists’ attitudes and sustainable VR tourism intentions

Calvin Wan, Peggy M. L. Ng, Cherry Tin Yan Cheung, Kam Kong Lit, Mei Mei Lau · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · 2025

Purpose As virtual reality (VR) technology continues to advance, its potential impacts and applications on the tourism industry become increasingly significant. This study aims to deepen the understanding of VR’s role in influencing tourists’ attitudes and sustainable VR tourism intention. This study also seeks to compare the effectiveness of VR CAVE versus desktop VR. Design/methodology/approach Data was gathered through two methods. One group of participants was invited to a laboratory equipped with VR CAVE, and another group of respondents was recruited from an online panel to test the effectiveness of using desktop VR. Data was analyzed using SmartPLS 4.0 for path significance and group differences. Findings The findings revealed that the perceived values of the VR experience significantly influenced VR immersion, including presence and flow. VR immersion subsequently influenced attitudes toward destinations, attitudes toward VR tourism and sustainable VR tourism intentions. The results of multigroup analysis indicated minor differences between both VR system setups. Originality/value These findings advance the understanding of VR’s influence on tourists’ attitudes and sustainable VR tourism intentions. Notably, the study highlights the efficacy of cost-effective VR setups in effectively shaping tourists’ attitudes and motivating sustainable VR tourism intentions.

Read the paper · More papers on PaperTik