Editorial: Leveraging artificial intelligence and open science for toxicological risk assessment

Marc Teunis, Thomas H. Luechtefeld, Thomas Härtung · Frontiers in Toxicology · 2025

The paradigm shift brought about by artificial intelligence (AI) across scientific disciplines has been nothing short of revolutionary. From unraveling the mysteries of protein folding to enabling autonomous systems, AI has demonstrated its potential to tackle previously intractable problems (Jumper et. al., 2021;Abramoff et al., 2023). In toxicology, this transformation arrives at a crucial moment, as we face mounting challenges in chemical safety assessment and an urgent need to reduce reliance on animal testing (Hartung, 2023a,b;Kleinstreuer and Hartung, 2024). This Research Topic emerged from a recognition that while computational toxicology has made significant strides using classical approaches such as physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR), the full potential of modern AI techniques remains largely untapped in toxicological risk assessment. The recent advances in machine learning, particularly deep learning, natural language processing, and semantic interoperability, offer unprecedented opportunities to integrate diverse data sources and create more predictive models for human health outcomes.The five contributions in this Research Topic showcase innovative approaches that bridge traditional toxicological methods with cutting-edge AI applications. Collectively, these works demonstrate the potential for AI to enhance our understanding of chemical hazards while advancing the development of more efficient, ethical, and human-relevant risk assessment strategies.Instability" This review highlights the potential of AI/ML and OMICS technologies to transform traditional toxicological assessments and predict genotoxicity and mutagenicity with higher accuracy. It discusses how AI/ML can establish biomarkers and signatures for early cancer detection, risk assessment, and monitoring of health impacts from chemical exposure. Additionally, it emphasizes how AI may accelerate the screening of chemicals for toxicological evaluation, optimizing resource use, and reducing reliance on animal testing. A common thread throughout these contributions is the emphasis on open science principles and reproducibility. The authors have shared their code, data, and methodologies through public repositories, enabling others to build upon their work. This commitment to transparency and collaboration exemplifies the transformation that AI is bringing not only to scientific problem-solving but also to the way we conduct and share research.Looking ahead, several challenges and opportunities emerge from these works. First, while AI shows promise in predicting toxicological endpoints, integrating these predictions into regulatory frameworks remains a significant hurdle (Hartung and Kleinstreuer, 2025).Second, the quality and accessibility of training data continue to be limiting factors in developing robust AI models. Finally, there is a pressing need for standardized approaches to validate AI-driven predictions in toxicology.Nevertheless, the works presented in this Research Topic demonstrate that we are moving closer to establishing a true probabilistic risk assessment framework (Maertens et al., 2022(Maertens et al., , 2024) that incorporates the full potential of AI. Such a framework could not only reduce animal testing but also provide more accurate predictions of human health effects.The integration of multiple data streams -from chemical structures to historical animal data, in vitro assays, and omics measurements -through AI approaches represents a promising path forward.We hope this Research Topic will serve as both an inspiration and a practical resource for researchers working at the intersection of AI and toxicology. As we continue to advance these methods, we move closer to more efficient, ethical, and accurate approaches to chemical safety assessment.

Read the paper · More papers on PaperTik