Physics at a Crossroads: Weird Concepts or Orthogonal Projections
Markolf H. Niemz · Preprints.org · 2024
Einstein’s special relativity (SR) and general relativity (GR) describe nature in “subjective concepts” (concepts of observers), such as spatial and temporal distance, wave, particle, force, and field. The word “subjective” does not imply that SR/GR would be limited to one point of view. It implies that, despite the Lorentz covariance of SR and the general covariance of GR, any point of view in SR/GR is egocentric. Even coordinate-free formulations of SR/GR or all observers’ views taken together do not make a “holistic view” (comprehensive view from all possible perspectives at the same instant in time) because there is no absolute time in SR/GR. Here I show: Euclidean relativity (ER) describes nature in “objective concepts” (concepts that are immanent in all objects). “Pure distance” replaces spatial and temporal distance. “Pure energy” replaces wave and particle. Each object’s proper space d1, d2, d3 and its proper time τ span an absolute 4D Euclidean spacetime (ES), where d1, d2, d3 and d4 = cτ are pure distances. The invariant is absolute, cosmic time θ. All energy moves through ES at the speed c. An observer’s reality is created by orthogonally projecting the “master reality” ES to his proper space and to his proper time. In SR and GR, the two projections are reassembled to a non-Euclidean spacetime. Information is lost in projections. Thus, there will always be unsolved mysteries if we oppose ER. SR/GR are subordinate theories: Their subjective concepts describe an observer’s reality. ER describes ES and how his reality is created. On top, ER solves 15 mysteries purely geometrically, that is, without forces, fields, and weird concepts (cosmic inflation, expanding space, dark energy, non-locality). Why do physicists prefer weird concepts to two orthogonal projections?