A logarithmic approximation algorithm for the activation edge-multicover problem

Zeev Nutov, Avner Huri, Guy Kortsarz ยท Theoretical Computer Science ยท 2026

In the Activation Edge-Multicover problem we are given a multigraph ๐บ = ( ๐‘‰ , ๐ธ ) with activation costs { ๐‘ ๐‘ข ๐‘’ , ๐‘ ๐‘ฃ ๐‘’ } for every edge ๐‘’ = ๐‘ข โข ๐‘ฃ โˆˆ ๐ธ , and degree requirements ๐‘Ÿ = { ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ฃ : ๐‘ฃ โˆˆ ๐‘‰ } . The goal is to find an edge subset J โІ E that minimizes the activation cost โˆ‘ ๐‘ฃ โˆˆ ๐‘‰ m a x โก { ๐‘ ๐‘ฃ ๐‘ข โข ๐‘ฃ : ๐‘ข โข ๐‘ฃ โˆˆ ๐ฝ } , such that every v โˆˆ V has at least r v neighbors in the graph ( V, J ). Let ๐‘˜ = m a x ๐‘ฃ โˆˆ ๐‘‰ โก ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ฃ be the maximum requirement and let ๐œƒ = m a x ๐‘’ = ๐‘ข โข ๐‘ฃ โˆˆ ๐ธ โก m a x โก { ๐‘ ๐‘ข ๐‘’ , ๐‘ ๐‘ฃ ๐‘’ } m i n โก { ๐‘ ๐‘ข ๐‘’ , ๐‘ ๐‘ฃ ๐‘’ } be the maximum quotient between the two costs of an edge. The case ๐œƒ = 1 (when ๐‘ ๐‘ข ๐‘’ = ๐‘ ๐‘ฃ ๐‘’ for all ๐‘’ = ๐‘ข โข ๐‘ฃ โˆˆ ๐ธ ) is the well studied Min-Power Edge-Multicover problem, that admits approximation ratio O (log k ). On the other hand, for ๐‘˜ = 1 the problem generalizes the Facility Location problem, and admits a tight approximation ratio O (log n ). This implies approximation ratio O ( k log n ) for general k and ฮธ (cf. [2]), and no better approximation ratio was known. Our main result is the first (poly-)logarithmic approximation ratio ๐‘‚ โข ( l o g โก ๐‘˜ + l o g โก m i n โก { ๐œƒ , ๐‘› } ) , that bridges between two known approximation ratios โ€“ O (log k ) for ๐œƒ = 1 and O (log n ) for ๐‘˜ = 1 . This also implies approximation ratio ๐‘‚ โข ( l o g โก ๐‘˜ + l o g โก m i n โก { ๐œƒ , ๐‘› } ) + ๐›ฝ ยท ( ๐œƒ + 1 ) for the Activation k -Connected Subgraph problem, where ฮฒ is the best known approximation ratio for the ordinary min-cost version of the problem. We also obtain the following improved approximation ratios for the Min-Power Edge-Multicover problem: (i) ๐‘˜ + 0 . 2 7 8 5 for general costs, improving the ratio of [3] for k โ‰ค 22. (ii) 1 + m a x ๐‘ฅ โ‰ฅ 1 โก l n โก ๐‘ฅ 1 + ๐‘ฅ / ๐œƒ for unit costs, improving the ratio 2.16 [3] for k โ‰ค 10.

Read the paper ยท More papers on PaperTik