Languages Given by Finite Automata over the Unary Alphabet
Czerwiński, Wojciech, Dębski, Maciej, Gogasz, Tomasz, Gordon Hoi, Sanjay K. Jain, Skrzypczak, Michał, Frank Stephan, Christopher M. Tan · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
This paper studies the complexity of operations on finite automata and the complexity of their decision problems when the alphabet is unary. Let $n$ denote the maximum of the number of states of the input finite automata considered in the corresponding results. The following main results are obtained: (1) Given two unary NFAs recognising $L$ and $H$, respectively, one can decide whether $L \subseteq H$ as well as whether $L = H$ in time $2^{O((n \log n)^{1/3})}$. The previous upper bound on time was $2^{O((n \log n)^{1/2})}$ as given by Chrobak (1986), and this bound was not significantly improved since then. (2) Given two unary UFAs (unambiguous finite automata) recognising $L$ and $H$, respectively, one can determine a UFA recognising $L \cup H$ and a UFA recognising complement of $L$, where these output UFAs have the number of states bounded by a quasipolynomial in $n$. However, in the worst case, a UFA for recognising concatenation of languages recognised by two $n$-state UFAs, uses $2^{Θ((n \log^2 n)^{1/3})}$ states. (3) Given a unary language $L$, if $L$ contains the word of length $k$, then let $L(k)=1$ else let $L(k)=0$. Let $ω_L$ be the $ω$-word $L(0)L(1)\ldots$ and let $\cal L$ be a fixed $ω$-regular language. The last section studies how difficult it is to decide, given an $n$-state UFA or NFA