Deontic-doxastic belief revision and linear system model
Andréa Vestrucci · Frontiers in Psychology · 2022
The limits of this article do not allow consideration of other belief revision theories -e.g., ranking theory (Spohn, , ; Huber, , ) and Bayesian model (Brown et al., ) -nor discussion of AGM theory being an idealization of actual human doxastic agents in light of the logical, epistemological, and empirical simplifications involved in AGM (Wassermann, ; Berto, ).However, this idealization is useful to formalize belief revision (Hansson, ), thus paving the way to models more adherent to real doxastic situations, such as Dynamic Epistemic Logic (Section ) and the linear system model (Section ).Any adherence is nevertheless affected by the distinction between model and modeled object.AGM's clarity and logical and computational versatility (Delgrande et al., ; Spurkeland et al., ) make it a good candidate to introduce the doxastic-nested-deontic grammar in this article.