Humble Connexivity

Andreas Kapsner · Logic and Logical Philosophy · 2019

In this paper, I review the motivation of connexive and strongly connexive logics, and I investigate the question why it is so hard to achieve those properties in a logic with a well motivated semantic theory. My answer is that strong connexivity, and even just weak connexivity, is too stringent a requirement. I introduce the notion of humble connexivity, which in essence is the idea to restrict the connexive requirements to possible antecedents. I show that this restriction can be well motivated, while it still leaves us with a set of requirements that are far from trivial. In fact, formalizing the idea of humble connexivity is not as straightforward as one might expect, and I offer three different proposals. I examine some well known logics to determine whether they are humbly connexive or not, and I end with a more wide-focused view on the logical landscape seen through the lens of humble connexivity.formalizing the idea of humble connexivity is not as straightforward as one might expect, andI offer three different proposals. I examine some well known logics to determine whether theyare humbly connexive or not, and I end with a more wide-focused view on the logical landscapeseen through the lens of humble connexivity.

Read the paper · More papers on PaperTik