Making a Bird AI Expert Work for You and Me
Dongliang Chang, Kaiyue Pang, Ruoyi Du, Yujun Tong, Yi-Zhe Song, Zhanyu Ma, Jun Guo · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2023
As powerful as fine-grained visual classification (FGVC) is, responding your query with a bird name of “Whip-poor-will” or “Mallard” probably does not make much sense. This however commonly accepted in the literature, underlines a fundamental question interfacing AI and human – what constitutes transferable knowledge for human to learn from AI? This paper sets out to answer this very question using FGVC as a test bed. Specifically, we envisage a scenario where a trained FGVC model (the AI expert) functions as a knowledge provider in enabling average people (you and me) to become better domain experts ourselves,i.e.,those capable in distinguishing between “Whip-poor-will” and “Mallard”. Fig. 1 lays out our approach in answering this question. Assuming an AI expert trained using expert human labels, we ask (i) what is the best transferable knowledge we can extract from AI, and (ii) what is the most practical means to measure the gains in expertise given that knowledge? On the former, we propose to represent knowledge as highly discriminative visual regions that are expert-exclusive. For that, we devise a multi-stage learning framework, which starts with modelling visual attention of domain experts and novices separately, before discriminatively distilling their differences to acquire those exclusive to experts. For the latter, we simulate the evaluation process as a book guide to best accommodate the learning practice of that is accustomed to humans. A comprehensive human study of 15,000 trials shows our method is able to consistently improve people of divergent bird expertise to recognise once unrecognisable birds. To counter the lack of reproducibility of perceptual studies, and in turn to make a sustainable direction out of our “AI for Human” effort, we further propose a quantitative metric, namely Transferable Effective Model Attention (TEMI). TEMI acts as a crude but benchmarkable metric to replace large-scale human studies, and therefore allows future efforts in this direction to be comparable to ours. We attest to the integrity of TEMI by (i) empirically showing a strong correlation between TEMI scores and raw human study data, and (ii) its expected behaviour holds for a large body of attention models. Last but not least, our approach also leads to improved FGVC performance in the conventional benchmarking sense, when the extracted knowledge defined is utilised as means to achieve discriminative localisation. Codes and all details on the human study are available at:https://github.com/PRIS-CV/Making-a-Bird-AI-Expert-Work-for-You-and-Me.