Critical Success Factors of TQM
Wakhid Slamet Ciptono · ISAHP proceedings · 2007
The study describes the use of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for the prioritization of critical success factors of TQM (CSFs of TQM).The use of multi attribute decision analysis for supporting the qualitative data analysis (analytic hierarchy process) has been considered the foremost technique for examining the manager's needs and the weightings of preferences from the panel of three levels of managers (top, middle, low) for each CSFs of TQM in the most objective way available.Two rounds of Delphi surveys were conducted.A significant consensus on the weighted evaluation of the six CSFs of TQM and the consistency ratio were obtained from twenty oil and gas managers.The results vividly reveal that AHP is a powerful and appropriate technique for deriving objective opinions in a rather subjective area such as the multi-attribute model for the prioritization of the CSFs of TQM.The results of qualitative data analysis (using MFEP) indicate that training to improve products/services provides the first priority (the weighted evaluation 0.184; 0.224; and 0.169 for top level managers, middle kevel managers, and low level managers); followed by Quality Improvement, Top Management Commitment, Supplier Involvement, Cross-Functional Relationships among SBUs, and Supervisory Leadership.In addition, the qualitative data analysis (using AHP) also provides a set of sufficiently consistent CSFs of TQM was obtain after the second round of Delphi questionnaire.The result of consistency ratio (CR) shows that the managers had highly satisfactory in assessing the prioritization of CSFs of TQM (CR = 0.0456).Therefore, these CSFs of TQM were supported the results from the quantitative data analysis.Oil and gas managers in Indonesia can use these qualitative data results in concert with other critical quality management practices to help them in there word-class company initiatives.The researcher recommended the use of Delphi method as an objective and rigorous determining consensus.Researchers can also use this method to combine qualitative and quantitative research approaches into mixed methodology or triangulation.©2005 Wakhid Slamet Ciptono.