Response to Reviewer #1
Daniele Minganti · 2020
We thank the reviewer for his in-depth review and useful comments.Following the reviewer's suggestion, we changed the structure of the paper and added supplemental figures.In order to better interpret our results, we inserted new figures showing the Eliassen-Palm Flux Divergence across the datasets.We also strove to improve the text by improving the structure and clarity of the Introduction and scientific discussions and by taking into account the additional references suggested by the reviewer.In our replies below the italic type is used for the reviewer's comments, the plain text for authors' answers and the bold type for the revised text in the manuscript. Replies to general comments.• Although the paper contains some interesting material, which should be published, the manuscript itself could be significantly improved qualitatively in some parts (Introduction and results).Some paragraphs and sections are poor, therefore, they need to be revised by enhancing the discussion about the scientific content, the structure of results presentations as well as the wording to improve the quality of the paper.