Argumentation for normative reasoning
Nir Oren, G. Flucke, Timothy J. Norman · 2008
Abstract. An agent’s behaviour is governed by multiple factors, including its beliefs/desires/intentions, its reasoning processes and societal influences acting upon it, such as norms. In this paper we propose an extensible argumentation inspired reasoning procedure, and show how it may be used to perform normative reasoning.. The language used by our procedure is built around defeasible, non-monotonic rules called argument schemes. The evaluation of the in-teractions between argument schemes and predicates is performed using a novel argumentation based technique. We show how issues such as normative conflict, priorities over norms, and the effects of norms may be represented using the framework, and how the agent may use these to reason effectively. 1