Restorative Justice in Artificial Intelligence Crimes
Adnan Hadziselimovic, Denis Roio · media/rep/ · 2019
In order to lay the foundations for a discussion around the argument that the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies benefits the powerful few, 1 focussing on their own existential concerns, 2 we decided to narrow down our analysis of the argument to jurisprudence (i.e. the philosophy of law), considering also the historical context.This paper signifies an edited version of Adnan Hadzi's text on Social Justice and Artificial Intelligence, 3 exploring the notion of humanised artificial intelligence 4 in order to discuss potential challenges society might face in the future.The paper does not discuss current forms and applications of artificial intelligence, as, so far, there is no AI technology, which is selfconscious and self-aware, being able to deal with emotional and social intelligence. 5It is a discussion around AI as a speculative hypothetical entity.One could then ask, if such a speculative self-conscious 1 Cp.G. Chaslot, "YouTube's A.I. was divisive in the US presidential election", Medium, November 27, 2016.Available at : https://medium.com/the-graph/youtubes-ai-is- neutral-towards-clicks-but-is-biased-towards-people-and-ideas-3a2f643dea9a#.tjuusil7 d [accessed