Acceptability Semantics for Weighted Argumentation Frameworks
Leïla Amgoud, Jonathan Ben-Naim, Dragan V. Doder, Srdjan Vesić · 2017
The paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, where each argument has a basic strength, and may be attacked by other arguments. It starts by defining a set of principles, each of which is a property that a semantics could satisfy. It provides the first formal analysis and comparison of existing semantics. Finally, it defines three novel semantics that satisfy more principles than existing ones.