Quantum illumination for enhanced detection of Rayleigh-fading targets

Quntao Zhuang, Zheshen Zhang, Jeffrey H. Shapiro · Physical Review A · 2017

Quantum illumination (QI) is an entanglement-enhanced sensing system whose performance advantage over a comparable classical system survives its usage in an entanglement-breaking scenario plagued by loss and noise. In particular, QI's error-probability exponent for discriminating between equally likely hypotheses of target absence or presence is 6 dB higher than that of the optimum classical system using the same transmitted power. This performance advantage, however, presumes that the target return, when present, has known amplitude and phase, a situation that seldom occurs in light detection and ranging (lidar) applications. At lidar wavelengths, most target surfaces are sufficiently rough that their returns are speckled, i.e., they have Rayleigh-distributed amplitudes and uniformly distributed phases. QI's optical parametric amplifier receiver---which affords a 3 dB better-than-classical error-probability exponent for a return with known amplitude and phase---fails to offer any performance gain for Rayleigh-fading targets. We show that the sum-frequency generation receiver [Zhuang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040801 (2017)]---whose error-probability exponent for a nonfading target achieves QI's full 6 dB advantage over optimum classical operation---outperforms the classical system for Rayleigh-fading targets. In this case, QI's advantage is subexponential: its error probability is lower than the classical system's by a factor of $1/ln(M\overline{\ensuremath{\kappa}}{N}_{S}/{N}_{B})$, when $M\overline{\ensuremath{\kappa}}{N}_{S}/{N}_{B}\ensuremath{\gg}1$, with $M\ensuremath{\gg}1$ being the QI transmitter's time-bandwidth product, ${N}_{S}\ensuremath{\ll}1$ its brightness, $\overline{\ensuremath{\kappa}}$ the target return's average intensity, and ${N}_{B}$ the background light's brightness.

Read the paper · More papers on PaperTik