Models for objective evaluation of dysarthric speech from data annotated by multiple listeners
Ming Tu, Yishan Jiao, Visar Berisha, Julie Liss · 2016
In subjective evaluation of dysarthric speech, the inter-rater agreement between clinicians can be low. Disagreement among clinicians results from differences in their perceptual assessment abilities, familiarization with a client, clinical experiences, etc. Recently, there has been interest in developing signal processing and machine learning models for objective evaluation of subjective speech quality. In this paper, we propose a new method to address this problem by collecting subjective ratings from multiple evaluators and modeling the reliability of each annotator within a machine learning framework. In contrast to previous work, our model explicitly models the dependence of the speaker on an evaluators reliability. We evaluate the model on a series of experiments on a dysarthric speech database and show that our method outperforms other similar approaches.