Cooperative Localization in Cellular Networks
Thabet Mismar · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2015
Wireless Sensor Network No spoofing attack (Figures 4.1-4.5) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figures 4.2 and 4.5) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figures 4.3 and 4.5) No spoofing attack (Figures 4.6-4.8) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-7) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-8) 3D No spoofing attack (Figures 4.9 and 4.10) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-9) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-10) No spoofing attack (Figures 4.11-4.13) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-12) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-13) Indoor NLOS 2D No spoofing attack (Figures 4.14 and 4.15) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-14) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-15) No spoofing attack (Figures 4.16 and 4.17) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-16) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-17) 3D No spoofing attack (Figures 4.18-4.21) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figures 4.18 and 4.20) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figures 4.19 and 4.21) No spoofing attack (Figures 4.16 and 4.17) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-16) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-17) Outdoor NLOS 2D No spoofing attack (Figures 4.26 and 4.27) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-26) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-27) No spoofing attack (Figures 4.28 and 4.29) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-28) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-29) 3D No spoofing attack (Figures 4.30 and 4.31) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-30) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-31) No spoofing attack (Figures 4.32 and 4.33) 1, 2, and 3 spoofing users with 20 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-32) 2 spoofing users with 20, 40, and 60 m spoofing error attack (Figure 4-33)