A Study of Encodings of Constraint Satisfaction Problems with 0/1 Variables
Patrick Prosser, Evgeny Selensky · ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) · 2003
Many constraint satisfaction problems (csp's) are formulated with 0/1 variables. Sometimes this is a natural encoding, sometimes it is as a result of a reformulation of the problem, other times 0/1 variables make up only a part of the problem. Frequently we have constraints that restrict the sum of the values of variables. This can be encoded as a simple summation of the variables. However, since variables can only take 0/1 values we can also use an occurrence constraint, e.g. the number of occurrences of 1 must be k. Would this make a di#erence? Similarly, problems may use channelling constraints and encode these as a biconditional such as P Q (i.e. P if and only if Q). This can also be encoded in a number of ways. Might this make a di#erence as well? We attempt to answer these questions, using a variety of problems and two constraint programming toolkits. We show that even minor changes to the formulation of a constraint can have a profound e#ect on the run time of a constraint program and that these e#ects are not consistent across constraint programming toolkits. This leads us to a cautionary note for constraint programmers: take note of how you encode constraints, and don't assume computational behaviour is toolkit independent.