Picking the Right Expert to Make a Debate Uncontroversial
Dionysios Kontarinis, Elise Bonzon, Nicolas Maudet, Pavlos Moraı̈tis · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · 2012
Agents contributing to (online) debate systems often have different areas of expertise. This must be considered if we want to define a decision making process based on the output of such a system. Distinguishing agents on the basis of their areas of expertise also opens an interesting perspective: when a debate is deemed “controversial”, calling an additional expert may be a natural way to make the decision easier. We introduce possible definitions that capture these notions and we provide a preliminary analysis with the objective to help a designer find the “right” expert.