Pacing Strategies
Amber L. Sapp, Matt Green, M FACS, Phill Bishop, M FACS, Mark T. Richardson, Kelley Kerr, Robert Prichett, Matthew D. Curtner‐Smith, Judy Geisen · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2007
PURPOSE: Studies regarding pacing strategies and subsequent influence on performance are limited particularly for running. This study compared pacing strategies of experienced (E) and inexperienced (I) runners completing a 3200-m time trial. METHODS: There were 17 inexperienced (10 males, 7 females) and 14 experienced (7 males, 7 females) participants. Classification (experienced/inexperienced) was based upon collegiate cross country participation, 5k run time, and training regimen. Subjects completed a treadmill VO2 max & three 3200-m track trials each separated by 2–7 days. Time splits (sec) for every 100m and heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) every 400m were recorded. Using only the final 3200-m time trial for analysis, individual deviation scores (each 100-m split vs. mean 100-m split) were calculated to assess the evenness of pacing. RESULTS: A 2 factor ANOVA showed a significantly (p= 0.00) lower mean deviation score for E males (0.84 +/− 0.22) vs. I males (1.76 +/− 0.77); suggesting greater experience results in a more even pacing strategy. Deviations scores were not significantly different for females (E = 0.87+/− 0.26, I = 1.31 +/−0.71) indicating greater experience does not result in more even pacing for females. CONCLUSIONS: Current results indicate the ability to distribute energy reserves across a 3200-m track time trial is enhanced by experience but only in males. Although current results extend the knowledge regarding pacing, the volume of experience necessary to develop the ability to pace evenly is unknown.