Medical image registration‐based retrieval using distance metrics
Swarnambiga Ayyachamy, Vasuki S. Manivannan · International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · 2013
ABSTRACT In this article, registration and retrieval are carried out separately for medical images and then registration‐based retrieval is performed. It is aimed to provide a more thorough insight on the use of registration, retrieval, and registration‐based retrieval algorithm for medical images. The purpose of this work is to deal these techniques with anatomical imaging modalities for clinical diagnosis, treatment, intervention, and surgical planning in a more effective manner. Two steps are implemented. In the first step, the affine transformation‐based registration for medical image is processed. The second step is the retrieval of medical images processed by using seven distance metrics such as euclidean, manhattan, mahalanobis, canberra, bray‐curtis, squared chord, chi‐squared, and also by using the features like mean, standard deviation, skewness, energy, and entropy. Now images registered by affine transformation are applied for retrieval. In this work, both registration and retrieval techniques in medical domain share some common image processing steps and required to be integrated in a larger system to complement each other. Experimental results, it is evident that euclidean and manhattan produces 100% precision and 35% recall found to have higher performance in retrieval. From the four anatomical modalities considered (brain, chest, liver, and limbs) brain image has better registration. It is also found that though the registration of images changes the orientation, for better performance of images in clinical evaluation it does not widely affect the retrieval performance. In the medical domain the ultimate aim of this work is to provide diagnostic support to physicians and radiologists by displaying relevant past cases, along with proven pathologies as ground truth from experimental results. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Imaging Syst Technol, 23, 360–371, 2013