The Internet as a Conduit for Criminal Activity
David S. Wall · 2005
While there appears to be a common view that the Internet has had a major impact upon criminality, there is much less consensus as to what that impact has been. Many sources make claims about the prevalence of cybercrimes (networked computer crime) without clarifying what is precisely the issue at hand. Indeed, when so-called cases of cybercrime come to court they often have the familiar ring of the 'traditional' rather than the 'cyber' about them. Fraud, pornography, paedophilia, etc., are already covered by substantive areas of law in most jurisdictions. Even more confusing is the gap between the many hundreds of thousands of estimated incidents and the relatively small number of known prosecutions - which questions the early predictions that cybercrimes, unless checked, could effectively bring criminals into every home. In fact, the confusion has led some authors to question whether or not there are indeed such things as cybercrimes (Brenner, 2001:1). Others, have questioned whether cybercrimes are actually categories of crime in need of new theory or whether they are better understood by existing theories (Jones, 2003:98). These contrasting viewpoints expose a large gap in our understanding and beg a number of questions. Are, for example, our concerns about cybercrime driven solely by the media sensitisation of one or two novel events and effectively fabricated into a crime wave. Or are the dramatic news stories the product of information sources created by the cyber-security industry which has a vested interest in sensationalising cybercrimes. Alternatively, could it simply be the case that the criminal justice processes are woefully inefficient at bringing wrongdoers to justice. There again, are we perhaps looking at an entirely new phenomena through the wrong lens?