Why the empirical literature fails to support or disconfirm modular or dual-process models
David Trafimow · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · 2007
Abstract Barbey & Sloman (B&S) present five models that account for performance in Bayesian inference tasks, and argue that the data disconfirm four of them but support one model. Contrary to B&S, I argue that the cited data fail to provide strong confirmation or disconfirmation for any of the models.