Automatic identification of patients eligible for a pneumonia guideline: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of two decision support models.
Charles Lagor, Dominik Aronsky, Marcelo Fiszman, Peter J. Haug · PubMed · 2001
BACKGROUND: In busy clinical settings, physicians often do not have enough time to identify patients for specific therapeutic guidelines. As a solution, decision support systems could automatically identify eligible patients and trigger computerized guidelines for specific diseases. Applying this idea to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), we developed a Bayesian network (BN) and an artificial neural network (ANN) for identifying patients who have CAP and are eligible for a pneumonia guideline. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of these two decision support models differs in terms of identifying CAP patients. METHODS: We trained and tested the networks with a data set of 32,662 adult patients. For each network, we (1) calculated the specificity, the positive predictive value (PPV), and the negative predictive value (NPV) at a sensitivity of 95%, and (2) determined the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a measure of overall accuracy. We tested for statistical difference between the AUCs using the correlated area z statistic. RESULTS: At a sensitivity of 95%, the respective values for specificity, PPV, and NPV were: 92.3%, 15.1%, and 99.9% for the BN, and 94.0%, 18.6%, and 99.9% for the ANN. The BN had an AUC of 0.9795 (95% CI: 0.9736, 0.9843), and the ANN had an AUC of 0.9855 (95% CI: 0.9805, 0.9894). The difference between the AUCs was statistically significant (p=0.0044). CONCLUSIONS: The networks achieved high overall accuracies on the testing data set. Because the difference in accuracies is statistically significant but not clinically significant, both networks are equally suited to drive a guideline.