Differences in search engine evaluations between query owners and non-owners
Alexandra Chouldechova, David Mease · 2013
The query-document relevance judgments used in web search engine evaluation are traditionally provided by human assessors who have no particular association with the specific queries selected for the evaluation. Most commonly, queries are randomly sampled from search logs and in turn randomly assigned to the human assessors. In this paper, we consider a very different approach in which we instead ask the human assessors to provide their own queries from their recent search experiences. Using these queries as our sample, we compare the relevance judgments from the "owners" of the queries to the relevance judgments of the non-owners.