An empirical evaluation and comparison of manual and automated test selection

Milos Gligoric, Stas Negara, Owolabi Legunsen, Darko Marinov · 2014

Regression test selection speeds up regression testing by re-running only the tests that can be affected by the most recent code changes. Much progress has been made on research in automated test selection over the last three decades, but it has not translated into practical tools that are widely adopted. Therefore, developers either re-run all tests after each change or perform manual test selection. Re-running all tests is expensive, while manual test selection is tedious and error-prone. Despite such a big trade-off, no study assessed how developers perform manual test selection and compared it to automated test selection.

Read the paper · More papers on PaperTik