IRIS at TREC-7.
Kiduk Yang, Kelly L. Maglaughlin, Lokman I. Meho, Robert G. Sumner · Text REtrieval Conference · 1998
In our TREC-5 ad-hoc experiment, we tested two relevance feedback models, an adaptive linear model and a probabilistic model, using massive feedback query expansion (Sumner & Shaw, 1997). For our TREC-6 interactive experiment, we developed an interactive retrieval system called IRIS (Information Retrieval Interactive System), which implemented modified versions of the feedback models with a three-valued scale of relevance and reduced feedback query expansion (Sumner, Yang, Akers & Shaw, 1998). The goal of the IRIS design was to provide users with ample opportunities to interact with the system throughout the search process. For example, users could supplement the initial query by choosing from a list of statistically significant, two-word collocations, or add and delete query terms as well as change their weights at each search iteration. Unfortunately, it was difficult to tell how much effect each IRIS feature had on the retrieval outcome due to such factors as strong searcher effect and major differences between the experimental and control systems. In our TREC-7 interactive experiment, we attempted to isolate the effect of a given system feature by making the experimental and control systems identical, save for the feature we were studying. In one interactive experiment, the difference between the experimental and control systems was the display and modification capability of term weights. In another experiment, the difference was relevance feedback by passage versus document. For the TREC-7 ad-hoc task, we wanted to examine the effectiveness of relevance feedback using a subcollection in order to lay the groundwork for future participation in the Very Large Corpus experiment. Though the pre-test results showed the retrieval effectiveness of a subcollection approach to be competitive with a whole collection approach, we were not able to execute the subcollection retrieval in the actual ad-hoc experiment due to hardware problems. Instead, our ad-hoc experiment consisted of a simple initial retrieval run and a pseudo-relevance feedback run using the top 5 documents as relevant and the 100 document as non-relevant. Though the precision was high in the top few documents, the ad-hoc results were below average by TREC measures as expected. In the interactive experiment, the passage feedback results were better than the document feedback results, and the results of the simple interface system that did not display query term weights were better than that of the more complex interface system that displayed query term weights and allowed users to change these weights. Overall interactive results were about average among participants.