Old problems, new directions and upcoming requirements in participatory technology assessment
Michael Ornetzeder, Karen Kastenhofer · Poiesis & Praxis · 2012
Discussions on the role of participatory approaches in technology assessment and technology policy have a long history.While in the beginning this subject was handled mainly as a theoretical requirement for democratic governance of technology, active involvement of stakeholders and laypeople became popular in TA exercises throughout the 1980s.Since then, a variety of participatory TA (pTA) methods and strategies have been developed and widely used, raising further farreaching expectations.It has been argued that participatory approaches might broaden and hence enrich the knowledge and value base in ongoing technological discourses and eventually improve the factual as well as democratic legitimacy of technology-related decisions (Joss and Bellucci 2002).Moreover, a stronger integration of diverse actors and stakeholders was linked to the promise of better socially embedded solutions, an increased acceptance and enhanced diffusion of technology as well as technology policy.However, practical experiences with pTA have shown that under real-world conditions, it is difficult to meet all these expectations (e.g.Abels and Bora 2004).Despite a continuing and widespread interest in pTA, empirical evidence and theoretical positions on the practical performance of pTA have remained ambiguous.The papers selected for this special issue refer to this ambiguity from different angles and aim to contribute to the ongoing discussion on theoretical foundations, as well as practical experiences and critical appraisals of various forms of pTA.Most ideas, experiences and findings covered by this collection had first been presented and discussed at the yearly conference on technology assessment at the Austrian Academy of Sciences in 2011. 1 In a similar vein, the papers in this special issue M. Ornetzeder (&) Á K.