Reply to comments on "Error rate performance of the projection code"
D. Li, Gyu-Sik Yang, Donald L. Schilling · IEEE Transactions on Communications · 1998
The authors reply to the comments by Koppelaar and Tolhuizen (see ibid. vol.46, no.9, p.573, 1998). They state that the optimum choice of the slopes used to perform the encoding process in a projection code always results in maximizing the minimum Hamming distance so that d=2/sup r/.