Comparing and assessing programming languages
Jarallah S. AlGhamdi, Joseph E. Urban · 1993
Manyatudieshavecumpared andassemed pgmming languages.Unfortunately, a comprehemive methodology fm comparison and ~~t of ~@Pll~~@ been developed.lle main reason behind the absence of such a methodology is that previous studies have Concentrated on comparing languages rather than M developing such a methodology.This paper lays the ground work fm establishing a comprehemive qualitative methodology to compare and assess general-purpose ~1-=.-of~fmtures of the general-purpose pmgmmn@ languages will be factored out as much as possible fm the comparison and assessment to be more awurate.Features that can not be identified precisely are not included.Features that are solely based on other features are not incl~either.llerefore, only fmldamentalfeatures am included.