Common sense and ``relevance''.
John P. Burgess · Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic · 1983
Introduction The relevance logicians of North America and the relevant logicians of the Antipodes have long claimed that their logical systems are in better agreement with common sense than is classical logic. The present paper is a critical examination of such claims. Though it is part of an on-going debate between classical and relevantistic logicians, I have tried to keep my discussion of the issues self-contained.