The Genetic Program: A Technocratic Hypothesis on the Paradigm of Civilization
Tzvetan Semerdjiev · Information & Security An International Journal · 2002
In the global evolution, these transitions are known as -paradigm -matter‖ (the idea of the universal intellect --big bang‖ and inflating universe), -organic environment -cell‖ (cytoplasm -homeostatic system) and -reflexive behavior -mental activity‖ (first signal systemsecond signal system).The three transitions are represented on figure 1.The latest studies show that their sequence in time and space is based on non-linearity, which reflects the giant evolution of the human knowledge about the surrounding reality. 2 Currently, for every one of these transitions there are new viewpoints.The last scientific hypothesis of the so-called -inflating‖ universe is transformed in -self-reproducing pulsing net‖ of -Big Bangs.‖ 3 Viewed as a branching tree structure of growing and shrinking subspaces, the universe is thought to be stationary by the laws of physics and space, despite the -mutations‖ in its separate nodes.Our part of the universe expands with a rate defined by the Hubbell constant, which is reliably measured.By the well-known laws of nature, the general properties and characteristics of the galaxies do not depend on the time of their creation and their evolution, because the branched net structure is stationary and very, very old.During the last 15 years, this allowed the cosmogony to change radically the views on the universe, the intellect and the man's place among them. 4In the context of the old interpretations we could hardly stand up for the Darwinian theory.The theory of origin of species has lots of time-space omissions that started to be filled in only recently.The most fundamental among them is the lack of conceptual interpretations for the new discoveries on the role of the genes in the processes of inheritance.Ever since 1865, when it was created, Gregor Mendel's theory is still not sufficiently compatible with the Darwinian theory. 5The gap was not filled in 1930, when Robert Fisher laid the foundation of the modern population genetics, nor was it filled in 1940, 6 when Theodosius Dobzhansky, Julian Huxley and Ernst Mayr synthesized the so-called -neo-Darwinism.‖ 7Nothing could have stayed in its way, if it was a complete and structured scientific theory.Unfortunately, it was not.Science continues to discover the mechanisms of life, but provides no explanation on the selfreproduction of gene molecules.Despite all this, the Darwinian theory is the only empiric paradigm that survived for more than 135 years and that provides a model we can use in practice for solving the hardest problem of modern science --the way, the super-complex living nature exists and adapts.‖If we arrange the events in the last 12 billion years since the Big Bang on a scale of one second for every 500 years, we shall get a general overview of the global evolutionary program in what we call -conditional year.‖In that year, man appears on 31 st of December at 22:30 h.Evolution on this scale is represented in table 1. Science has enough empiric material to form the hypothesis for a priori existence of primary structural/ functional information, i.e., a core of dynamic paradigmatic