DEFENDING THE DYNAMICAL HYPOTHESIS
Tim van Gelder · Studies of nonlinear phenomena in life science · 1999
this paper is to rebut a representative selection of these objections. There are two major reasons for undertaking this project. The first is to provide a partial defense of the DH as an open empirical alternative to the CH. As J.S. Mill put it, "three-fourths of the arguments for every disputed opinion consist in dispelling the appearances which favour some opinion different from it."