On the relation between legal language and legal argument
Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor · 1995
This paper investigates how of legal language determine tack and defend argu rnents argumentation framework in the logical aspects possibilities to atin a dispute.An logic-programming style is presented which can cope with the hterplay between assumptions, applicability statements and reasoning about, preference relations between norms.The theory is given a solid semantic foundation, and can be used to formalise a wide range of realistic legal examples.