Signed Peer Reviews as a Means to Improve Scholarly Publishing

Linwood H. Pendleton · Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics · 2015

Peer review is a necessary process with a long history of complaints, including over-solicitation of a small number of reviewers, delays, inadequate numbers of reviewers, and a lack of incentives to provide strong reviews or avoid reviews with little helpful information for the author. In the era of Web-based distribution of research, through working paper or project reports, anonymous peer reviews are much less likely. The Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics will use signed peer reviews and an open communication process among authors, reviewers, and editors. This approach, to be developed over time, should lead to stronger communication of research results for the Journal's readers. Lea el abstracto en español

Read the paper · More papers on PaperTik