From ranking to intransitive preference learning: rock-paper-scissors and beyond
Tapio Pahikkala, Willem Waegeman, Evgeni Tsivtsivadze, T. Salakoski, Bernard De Baets · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · 2009
In different fields like decision making, psychology, game theory and biology, it has been observed that paired-comparison data like preference relations defined by humans and animals can be intransitive. The relations may resemble the well-known game of rock-paper-scissors. In the game, rock defeats scissors and scissors defeat paper, but rock loses to paper. Intransitive relations cannot be modelled with existing machine learning methods like ranking models, because these models exhibit strong transitivity properties. More specifically, in a stochastic context, where often the reciprocity property characterizes probabilistic relations such as choice probabilities, it has been formally shown that ranking models always satisfy the well-known strong stochastic transitivity property. Given this limitation of ranking models, we present a new kernel function that together with the regularized least-squares algorithm is capable of inferring intransitive reciprocal relations in problems where transitivity violations cannot be considered as noise. In this approach it is the kernel function that defines the transition from learning transitive to learning intransitive relations, and the Kronecker-product is introduced for representing the latter type of relations. In addition, we empirically demonstrate on two benchmark problems in game theory and biology that our algorithm outperforms methods not capable of learning intransitive reciprocal relations.