Consequence-based reasoning beyond horn ontologies
František Simančík, Yevgeny Kazakov, Ian Horrocks · 2011
Consequence-based ontology reasoning procedures have so far been known only for Horn ontology languages. A difficulty in extending such procedures is that non-Horn axioms seem to require reasoning by case, which causes non-determinism in tableau-based procedures. In this paper we present a consequence-based procedure for ALCH that overcomes this difficulty by using rules similar to ordered resolution to deal with disjunctive axioms in a deterministic way; it retains all the favourable attributes of existing consequence-based procedures, such as goal-directed “one pass ” classification, optimal worst-case complexity, and “pay-asyou-go” behaviour. Our preliminary empirical evaluation suggests that the procedure scales well to non-Horn ontologies. 1